Image

‘Global warming’ is the Trojan Horse the regulating class (corporations)are hoping to ride to victory over the people.

The Elite class (corporations) aims to gain global bureaucratic control via a global AGW treaty..

monopoly board

After reading Tallbloke’s blog on how the BBC (media)are
quote
“BBC journalists are being sent on courses to stop them inviting so many cranks onto programmes to air ‘marginal views’
The BBC Trust on Thursday published a progress report into the corporation’s science coverage which was criticised in 2012 for giving too much air-time to critics who oppose non-contentious issues.”

http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2014/07/04/biased-bbc-sending-journos-on-how-to-break-our-charter-courses/comment-page-1/#comment-81928
——————————-
I responded to TB with my concerns

weathercycles says:

July 4, 2014 at 11:13 am

Was reading the global company news yesterday and there seems to be big push for ‘green energy/sustainability’ etc currently. (see Guardian/ sustainability section)
I don’t pretend to understand how the big global companies make money out of the AGW propaganda / carbon credit stuff.?
I read that global warming is causing the financial economy to collapse. LOL

For a reason l don’t understand global companies have their fortunes/ control mechanisms hinged on this AGW scam.
They obviously need to have the public on board to implement carbon trading or green credits?.
Global companies have taken over the western media and beyond so it is no surprise that employees are being told to tow the line or ship out!

There is no such thing as un biased reporting anymore. Companies control the lot. They feed the public what ever suits their corporate power population manipulation.
Including universities and school education and the media

Control, control..control
and if they have infiltrated the judiciary system TB . You haven’t got a hope.
They will try to make it illegal to be sceptical about AGW or anything that suits them for that matter.

If companies control everything . Where is their accountability?
There isn’t any.
Monopoly . Game set and match

If you make enough noise they may try to shut you down on wordpress or censor you..
Your aiming to challenge the ‘big wigs’ of the New world corporate government.

——————————————————————————————

I did some research as to why the Global elite ( corporations) are desperately wanting to stimmy AGW debate
There are ulterior motives
————————
Thanks to JO NOVA and

DAVID EVANS

for enlightening me
JO was onto this manipulation and control in 2012!! How prophetically true JO!
EXTRACTS.. . Serious stuff here!!
But above all, they want to shut their critics up—by any means short of violence. Opinions and evidence counter to the interests of the regulating class are “illegitimate”, and are ruthlessly suppressed.

http://joannenova.com.au/2012/03/climate-coup-the-politics/

Obviously the regulating class will now respond by regulating the Internet and lobbyist’s briefcases.

The Regulating Class
————————
Consider the array of forces in the climate argument:
Believers
————
UN (including the IPCC)
Western governments
NGO’s and Greenies
Totalitarian leftists
Government-funded
Academia
Renewables corporations
Mainstream news media
Major banks and finance houses
———
Doubters
——
Independently-funded scientists
Private sector middle class
Amateurs (from amore , the Latin for love)
———–

Why Global Warming is So Important to the Regulating Class

If human emissions of CO2 are causing a major planetary problem, then there are only two plausible solutions: wait and adapt, or regulate and reduce. Only the second solution interests the regulating class. To regulate CO2 emissions effectively and fairly you must regulate nearly all energy use, and thus most of the economy, in every nation of the world.
The regulating class promotes the dual beliefs that the “problem” of global warming is very scary and that it is caused by human emissions of CO2. The only solution they offer just happens to be complete regulation of the whole world’s economy by … the regulating class, of course.
The theory of manmade global warming is not a conspiracy. It is a confluence of vested interests in increased political regulation of the economy and rejecting market forces.
Bureaucrats, academics, government scientists, utilities, renewables manufacturers, bankers, most politicians—all these have a shared financial interest in imposing their solution to “manmade” global warming.
——————-

The Copenhagen Treaty was an Attempted Coup

Nearly all the world leaders met in Copenhagen in late 2009, expecting to sign the “Copenhagen Treaty” to limit CO2 emissions. But China and India torpedoed the negotiations, saying more research was needed to establish whether warming is manmade
The Treaty would have set up a new bureaucracy with the power to regulate CO2 emissions worldwide, able to regulate any market, over-riding national governments as required.
It could also fine and tax any signatory government.
In the hands of a judge from the regulating class, it could be interpreted to give this new global bureaucracy the power to tax every signatory nation and regulate its energy use almost completely—just look at how the US Constitution has been extended by interpretation over the years, and that’s a much clearer document. A hint in the Treaty could become the basis for a full blown mechanism to do almost anything the bureaucrats wished.
From experience with the monotonic growth of centralized power in federations of states, such as the United States or Australia, it is almost inevitable that within a few decades this new body would be parlayed up into a strong global bureaucracy regulating more than just CO2 emissions.

If something like the draft Treaty had been signed, it would have been the biggest transfer of sovereign power in recorded human history: nearly all the nations of the world would have ceded much of their sovereign power all at once. Yet the media scarcely raised an eyebrow.
All of that national sovereignty would have been ceded to an unelected group of global bureaucrats: Never in the field of human administration would so much power have been transferred by so many to so few. This was a narrowly averted global coup, an attempt to seize a great deal of power by stealth without the knowledge or explicit consent of the world’s people. It can only have been kept silent with the active support of the world’s media. But because of that silence, the coup has never been acknowledged, so the people of the world are unaware of it and further attempts could be made. Climate “science” is clearly flawed, but it is an excuse for a massive power play.

Figure 2: It is one of the oldest scams in human history: witchdoctors go to the rulers and say “the Gods are angry, there will be (more) catastrophes … we know how to appease the Gods, but it will cost you”. [Credit: CDC]

A Global Bureaucracy Would Be Bad

If a bureaucracy is global, there is nowhere to run to from high taxes, persecution, exploitation, selective enforcement of regulations, and so on
If their “solution” to global warming ushered in a global bureaucracy, people like these would be setting regulations worldwide, with no escape for anyone
The Trademark Tactics of the Regulating Class
If you oppose the regulating class, you will get called an “extremist”, a “nut”, a “conspiracy theorist”, “right wing”, and every variation of “stupid” and “ignorant”, irrespective of the merits of what you say. Say anything that mentions or might imply race and they will also call you a “racist”. Because they own the mainstream media

They hold pretend debates in their media studios with an audience of their supporters or a panel predominately of their supporters
The result: professionals and organizations appear to be all on their side. After all, they have all the government power, and all the taxpayers’ money.
Climate criminals almost took control of the whole world by deception, a grand fraud. Money has changed hands on a vast scale
All the beneficiaries are from the new regulating class, which happens to be in charge of the justice system. So no one will go to jail or even pay back their ill-gotten gains to the taxpayers. The rest of society paid for this nonsense, transferring huge quantities of money to the new class,

Conclusions

The push towards a global bureaucracy, using climate change as an excuse,
The real issue here is a grab for absolute power by those who already govern. They have grown tired of democracy and would like to do away with it, without ever giving the game away by actually saying so.
“global warming” is the Trojan Horse the regulating class are hoping to ride to victory over the people.

About the Author
Dr David M.W. Evans

consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010,
In 2007 .. skeptical …. there was more to the global warming issue than just the science..

http://joannenova.com.au/2012/03/climate-coup-the-politics/

Advertisements

21 comments on “‘Global warming’ is the Trojan Horse the regulating class (corporations)are hoping to ride to victory over the people.

  1. Corporations have put the money in to win global dominancy through AGW global protocols.
    report 2009
    http://joannenova.com.au/2009/07/massive-climate-funding-exposed/

    Now in 2014 ,they want the pay off..
    They still don’t have a global agreement yet !! phew!!

    But aren’t they working hard on the media and global governments to work towards a new global deal!

    Just read the Guardian newspaper on sustainability

    publication of a new report, Risky Business: The Economic Risks of Climate Change in the United States.

    The product of a bipartisan group, bringing together the former mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, three former US Treasury Secretaries (Hank Paulson, Robert Rubin and George Schultz), and the billionaire investor Tom Steyer, Risky Business shows the growing realisation that tackling climate change is both an economic imperative and an enormous opportunity. The publication of the report is yet another indication that the financial community is beginning to take climate change seriously.
    So, is there a role of investors in the climate change debate? This year alone, investors have filed more than 140 climate-related shareholder resolutions with US companies. At the same time, a coalition of investors called the Carbon Asset Risk (CAR) initiative, coordinated by Ceres and the Carbon Tracker initiative, with support from the Global Investor Coalition on Climate Change, launched a coordinated effort to encourage 45 of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies to address the financial risks posed by climate change.
    But it is clear that investors could be doing more. There is a major opportunity for investors to demonstrate that they are increasingly ready for serious climate action from policymakers ahead of the UN Secretary-General’s

    Climate Summit in September 2014, which is anticipated to build momentum for a strong global climate agreement in 2015.

    http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/risky-business-climarte-change-us-obama-investors

  2. Future of Carbon Farming Initiative unclear
    July 2014
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-03/carbon-farming-initiative/5568502?WT.ac=localnews_canberra

    extract
    “Chief executive of the Carbon Market Institute, Peter Castellas, says if the carbon tax is abolished and Direction Action isn’t legislated, carbon farming investors will lose out.

    “Companies who are investing in the carbon farming initiative, or have made an investment and are generating carbon credits as a result of the abatement generated, won’t be able to sell those units either to the liable entities under the carbon pricing mechanism, or to the government through the purchasing of abatement,” Mr Castellas said.

  3. The BBC in England
    I am on the trail of who are the ‘big wigs’ that want to deceive the population about AGW in order to gain control of the globe via the next upcoming AGW sustainability / climate agreement between nations
    The three climate scientists were Myles Allen, Mike Hulme, and myself.( Richard betts)
    Richard continues
    but I know Jean-Pascal van Ypersele was there because he stayed on and we had a chat afterwards. Jonathan Lynn (IPCC Head of Communciations and Media Relations) too.
    The BBC invited me. I have no idea how they decided who to invite, but I have been interviewed by the BBC many times so it’s not surprising that I am on their radar as climate scientist and IPCC author who is prepared to talk to media audiences.
    This meeting happened before the release of IPCC AR5, and hence before the various BBC interviews with our host and Lord Lawson.

    This artcle has lots of juicy names
    http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2014/7/4/the-bbc-and-its-scientists.html

    more from comments section
    The Bridcut Report itself was commissioned by the BBC Governors and the BBC Executive but was an independent report by Mr Bridcut. He concluded that the Seminar included ‘some of the best scientific experts’. His report was presented to the BBC Trust, which accepted the report, agreed the principles outlined within it and approved the recommendations for the Trust.
    —————-

    complaints to the BBC here

    However, if you feel there are specific instances where the BBC has not met expected standards of impartiality then you can of course raise them using the BBC complaints process. Details of the process are available online at http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints.
    I hope this is helpful.
    Yours sincerely
    John Hamer
    —————-

    The only “explanation” was in Mr. Hamer’s reply which stated that;
    “The seminar to which you refer was held on 26 January 2006 under the Chatham House Rule. It was organised in partnership with the
    Cambridge Media and Environmental Programme (CMEP) in conjunction with BBC News and BBC Vision. It pre-dated the Trust and was not a BBC Trust event.”
    Essentially what is been said “it didn’t happen on our watch, so there’s nothing we can do”
    That the time of the seminar predated the BBC Trust may indeed be the case, but it does not absolve the Trust, as editorial decisions are still being informed by this seminar.
    Yours sincerely,
    Dr. D. Keiller
    ————–
    I have just read the well researched and footnoted paper in PDF: “Christopher Booker: The BBC and Climate Change: A Triple Betrayal”, linked from the GWPF website. After reading this nothing surprises me about the lengths to which the BBC will go to maintain the groupthink of the organisation in this case about Climate Change. They fervently believe in the cause and will do anything to prove they are right.
    http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2014/7/4/the-bbc-and-its-scientists.html
    ——————-
    “The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate” a (so-called) “independent” group which launched itself on Sept. 24, 2013 – and which will oh-so-conveniently reveal its (expert, of course!) Report on “The New Climate Economy”:

    The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate is a major new international initiative to analyse and communicate the economic benefits and costs of acting on climate change. Chaired by former President of Mexico Felipe Calderón [and co-chaired by good ol’ Lord Nicholas Stern of Stern Report fame or infamy, depending on one’s familiarity and/or perspective -hro], the Commission comprises former heads of government and finance ministers and leaders in the fields of economics and business.

    The New Climate Economy is the Commission’s flagship project. It aims to provide independent and authoritative evidence on the relationship between actions which can strengthen economic performance and those which reduce the risk of dangerous climate change
    ——————-
    UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has invited world leaders, from government, finance, business, and civil society to the Climate Summit this 23 September to galvanize and catalyze climate action. He has asked these leaders to bring bold announcements and actions to the Summit that will reduce emissions, strengthen climate resilience, and mobilize political will for a meaningful legal agreement in 2015. The Climate Summit provides a unique opportunity for leaders to champion an ambitious vision, anchored in action that will enable a meaningful global agreement in 2015.

  4. The NEW CLIMATE ECONOMY

    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/approach
    extract
    The project’s approach combines such engagement with new research. We will seek to bring together and synthesise work done by a large number of research institutes, international organisations and others from around the world. The New Climate Economy work programme work is organised into three workstreams: Economic Pathways, Energy and Finance, and Drivers of Growth. You may read more on each to the right.

    The project will report in September 2014. We will present our findings directly to decision makers, and communicate them to the wider public through a variety of global and national media channels, and public meetings in a number of countries.
    ——————————————-
    The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate
    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/global-commission

    extract
    is a major new international initiative to analyse and communicate the economic benefits and costs of acting on climate change. Chaired by former President of Mexico Felipe Calderón, the Commission comprises former heads of government and finance ministers and leaders in the fields of economics and business.

    The project is being undertaken by a global partnership of research institutes and a core team led by Programme Director Jeremy Oppenheim. An Advisory Panel of world-leading economists, chaired by Lord Nicholas Stern will carry out an expert review of the work.

    The Project Team

    The New Climate Economy (NCE) project is led by Programme Director Jeremy Oppenheim. The project team is headquartered in London, with members located in the partner institutes in Addis Ababa, Beijing, New Delhi, San Francisco, Seoul, Stockholm and Washington DC.

    Nicholas Bianco

    Nicholas Bianco is a Senior Associate at the World Resources Institute. He manages Washington D.C. operations for the New Climate Economy, and helps coordinate the Country Transitions workstream

    Barbara Buchner

    Barbara Buchner is Senior Director of Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) and head of CPI Europe. Based in Venice, Barbara leads CPI’s work stream on global climate finance. Her work focuses on international climate finance to address the question of whether it is adequate and productive. Within the New Climate Economy, she leads CPI’s contribution on the effectiveness of policies to trigger investment.

    Hin Hei Chan (Haily)

    Hin Hei Chan (Haily) is an intern of the innovation policy work stream at the New Climate Economy. She conducts research on the impact of government policy on innovation technologies. Her work helpsgenerate historical case studies that will deliver practical policy recommendations. Prior to the current internship, Haily interned at a Hong Kong gas company supporting corporate environmental responsibility, and also worked at Greenpeace during her bachelor studies

    Sarah Chapman

    Sarah Chapman is the Chief of Staff for the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, responsible for operations across the work of the Commission and its flagship project, the New Climate Economy. Previously, Sarah was Director and Head of Business Development at Climate Bridge in Australia, an international business that finances renewable energy projects in China via international carbon markets. Earlier in her career, she was a consultant at McKinsey & Company, where she focused on climate finance and policy.

    Ben Combes

    Ben Combes is a co-principal on the New Climate Economy with John Llewellyn, working on the macroeconomic programme. Ben has over ten years’ experience working in economics, strategy, and policy. An experienced macroeconomist, he also has extensive environmental economics expertise, across both public and private sectors. Ben spent four years in the UK Government Economic Service working on macro themes: first, on energy and environment at Defra; then on climate change at the UK Committee on Climate Change with Adair Turner (Chair). Before that, he spent three years at macroeconomic consultancies: GFC Economics with Graham Turner, analysing G8 economies; and Oxford Economics.

    Tan Copsey

    Tan Copsey is Senior Communications Manager for the New Climate Economy. He has previously worked for BBC Media Action as well as the global environmental non-profit chinadialogue and the third pole project, online political magazine openDemocracy and The University of Auckland, New Zealand. During his time at BBC Media Action, he managed research, wrote reports, and helped develop communications for Climate Asia – the largest ever study of people’s experience of climate change in seven countries – Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan and Vietnam. Tan has written extensively on the international politics of climate change for publications including The Guardian: Comment is free, The Guardian Weekly and openDemocracy. Other highlights include reports on China’s transition to a low-carbon economy and giving the keynote address opening Climate Communications Day during international climate negotiations in Doha, 2012.

    Christopher Delgado

    Christopher Delgado is a Sr. Fellow at the World Resources Institute in Washington, D.C., where he works on the interactions among climate change, agriculture, and food security. He is the workstream lead for Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use Change for the New Climate Economy. Previously, he was Economics and Policy Adviser in the Agriculture and Environmental Services Department at the World Bank, and led the Department’s Agricultural and Environmental Economics and Policy Practice. He was the founding Program Manager of both the Bank’s internal Global Food Crisis Response Program (GFRP) and the G20-requested Global Agricultural and Food Security Program (GAFSP). GFRP and GAFSP between them have to date allocated US$2.5 billion through approximately 100 food-related projects in the world’s poorest countries, the majority on a grant basis. Prior to joining the World Bank, he was director of the Markets Theme at the International Livestock Research Institute in Nairobi, Kenya (2003-2006), and spent 26 years as a researcher at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Ian de Cruz

    Ian de Cruz is Research Director for the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, responsible for developing the overall research strategy and intellectual framework for the work of the Commission and its flagship project, the New Climate Economy. This role requires working closely with the Programme Director, Global Commission, research partners and Economic Advisory Panel. Ian has a diverse professional background including previous roles as Project Director of the Garnaut Climate Change Review in Australia and Head of Climate Change Response for an international development organisation, World Vision

    Graham Floater

    Graham Floater is EGC Director and Principal Research Fellow at the London School of Economics. He leads the Cities Work Programme for NCE. Formerly, he was a senior advisor to the UK Prime Minister, a deputy director at the UK Treasury and a lead trade negotiator for the European Commission in the WTO. Graham has a BA in natural science from Oxford, a postgraduate degree in economics from Cambridge, and a PhD in population risk modelling.

    Linda Gillespie

    Linda Gillespie is Executive Assistant to Jeremy Oppenheim at the New Climate Economy

    Nick Godfrey

    Nick Godfrey is a senior economist for the New Climate Economy, where he leads the coordination of the cities workstream examining the costs and benefits of climate action in cities. Nick has over ten years’ experience providing strategic and economic advice in relation to responding to climate change, resource scarcities, and catalysing economic development. He is on sabbatical from his position on the Atkins futures team, which provides leading thinking on the future of cities, including authoring a major global report on Future Proofing Cities with the UK Government and University College London and endorsed by the World Bank and Rockefeller Foundation. Nick joined Atkins in April 2011 from the Department for International Development (DFID) where he provided advice on avoided deforestation and low carbon development for the climate change negotiations and supported design of the UK’s £2.9 billion International Climate Fund

    Lucy Godshall

    Lucy Godshall is the policy innovation intern for the New Climate Economy in their London office,

    Stefan Heck

    Stefan Heck is jointly leading the Innovation Workstream with Cathy Zoi at the New Climate Economy.

    Kimberly Henderson

    Kimberly Henderson is a Senior Programme Officer with the New Climate Economy, responsible for coordinating the innovation research. She works to ensure NCE’s innovation research is delivered

    Cameron Hepburn

    Cameron Hepburn is Senior Advisor at the New Climate Economy, providing economic and strategic advice. He is Professor of Environmental Economics at the University of Oxford and Professorial Research Fellow at the LSE, and he brings academic expertise and experience in climate economics. Cameron wrote two background research papers for the Stern Review, and has co-founded three companies in the energy/environment/economics area, most recently Aurora Energy Research.

    Gaetan Hinojosa

    Gaetan Hinojosa is a part-time intern on the New Climate Economy, working on innovation policies in the area of smart grids and smart meters. His responsibilities include conducting research and assisting with the production of the final report. Before joining the NCE team, Gaetan was a consultant in the investment banking sector and held positions at the U.N. and the International Atomic Energy Agency

    Michael Jacobs

    Michael Jacobs is Senior Adviser to the New Climate Economy, responsible for supporting the Program Director and management team on overall strategy. He is Visiting Professor at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics, and in the School of Public Policy at University College London, and Senior Adviser at the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations in Paris. He was formerly Special Adviser to UK Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown. An economist, he has written extensively on environmental economics and politics.

    Robert Kirchner

    Robert Kirchner is a Programme Analyst at the New Climate Economy, co-responsible for the macroeconomics workstream of the project.

    Jan Ivar Korsbakken

    Jan Ivar Korsbakken is the Senior Programme Officer for the Energy workstream at the New Climate Economy. He coordinates energy-related work at NCE, and carries out research on the impact and economics of different energy mixes and policy measures in the power sector

    Marientina Laina

    Marientina Laina is the Program Analyst for the innovation policies stream at the New Climate Economy. She coordinates a team of junior researchers from the London School of Economics

    John Llewellyn

    John Llewellyn is a co-principal on New Climate Economy, working on the macroeconomic programme. Before co-founding Llewellyn Consulting, John was Global Chief Economist, and then Senior Economic Policy Advisor, at Lehman Brothers. This followed 17 years at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Paris, where variously he was Head of International Forecasting and Policy Analysis, editor of the OECD Economic Outlook, Deputy Director for Social Affairs, Manpower and Education, and finally Chef de Cabinet to the Secretary-General.

    Austin Morton

    Austin Morton is the Junior Communications Manager at the New Climate Economy, responsible for web and social media engagement. He works to ensure our online presence increases our reach, delivers consistent messages about the project, and communicates NCE research in compelling ways. Prior to joining NCE, Austin was a Senior Associate at International Resources Group where he helped development practitioners share their successes and engage development communities with best practices to strengthen outcomes

    Poorva Puri

    Poorva Puri is an Innovation Intern at the New Climate Economy Project, responsible for researching policy on innovation.

    Adriana Quintero

    Adriana Quintero is the Senior Communications Manager at the New Climate Economy, responsible for stakeholder engagement. As a project with global outreach and appeal, it is imperative for NCE to socialize and consult a wide range of groups and ensure their input in the research and final findings of the report. Prior to joining NCE, Adriana had extensive international stakeholder engagement experience in both private and government sectors, including Cerrejon in Colombia, UKTI in Mexico and Henkel in Germany helping various projects in their international outreach and communications with multiple stakeholders.

    Philipp Rode

    Philipp Rode is Executive Director of LSE Cities and the Urban Age Programme. He is Senior Research Fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science and for NCE co-directs the work stream on cities. For over 10 years, he has been leading interdisciplinary projects comprising urban governance and policy, transport, city planning and urban design. Recently, this included the coordination of the green cities work for the United Nations Environment Programme’s Green Economy Initiative.

    Daniel Russo

    Daniel Russo is an intern at the New Climate Economy, responsible for innovation policy research and analysis. He works on case studies related to high speed rail and its implication for future sustainable infrastructure policy. Prior to joining NCE, Daniel was an emerging markets finance analyst at Barclays Capital in New York, with a focus on Latin America

    James Rydge

    James Rydge is a Senior Programme Officer at the New Climate Economy, working on the Economic Pathways research programme. Prior to joining NCE, James was the Dahrendorf Research Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science. In this role he worked closely with Lord Nicholas Stern, collaborating across a wide range of research areas, including on the economics of the low-carbon transition in developed and developing countries. James has a PhD in Economics and a Master’s in Finance from the University of Sydney. Previously, he worked at the Bank of New York Mellon in London and PricewaterhouseCoopers in Sydney.

    Aparna Singh

    Aparna Singh is an Associate at the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. She is responsible for coordinating the production of visual communication material across the seven workstreams of the New Climate Economy project. She works to ensure quality and integrity of visuals, particularly owning the bank of the project’s PowerPoint slides. Previously, Aparna was a consultant at McKinsey & Company, where she worked on a range of sustainability projects such as researching the economic value of oceans and designing a green investment bank from scratch.

    Li Tang

    Li Tang is the Innovation Policy Intern at the New Climate Economy, responsible for researching how Chinese government’s policies have supported the electric vehicle technology

    Daniele Viappiani

    Daniele Viappiani is Senior Programme Officer at the New Climate Economy, where he is contributing directly to the research on Drivers of Growth while also helping to ensure the overall research programe is sound, relevant and communicated clearly. Daniele is seconded from the UK Department for Energy and Climate Change, where he works as senior economist on International Climate Change. Prior to joining NCE, Daniele held a number of positions on climate change and food security at the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, including as head of the UK government research programme on climate change adaptation

    Thomas Vladeck

    Thomas Vladeck is a Senior Programme Officer at the New Climate Economy project, responsible for coordinating the Finance workstream. He works with Climate Policy Initiative, one of NCE’s research partners, and helps to manage their global research efforts and to liaise between CPI and NCE and other partner institutions. Prior to joining NCE, Tom was an entrepreneur and led an energy efficiency finance startup; in the past Tom has led the development of a major research publication and worked in carbon finance.

    Dimitri Zenghelis

    Dimitri Zenghelis is Acting Chief Economist for New Climate Economy, providing a rigorous and responsible application of the economics toolkit to analyse the diverse challenges at hand. He is also joint Head of Policy at the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics. Previously, he headed the Stern Review Team at the Office of Climate Change, London, and was one of the authors of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change

    Xiao Zhao

    Xiao Zhao is the Program Analyst at the New Climate Economy, responsible for ensuring the quality and reliability of the core-data sets. She also supports the Chief of Staff in managing project operations and supports the Communication team on Chinese language media. Prior to joining NCE, Xiao was interning at Low Carbon Lab at Tsinghua University, where she helped build a CDM database.

    Cathy Zoi

    Cathy Zoi is jointly leading the Innovation Workstream with Stefan Heck at the New Climate Economy. Cathy is overseeing research into how innovation in energy, transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, materials and software can both stimulate economic growth and result in significant greenhouse gas reductions. Cathy is currently a Consulting Professor at Stanford University and has been a senior executive in both the private and public sectors, including the US DOE where she was Assistant and Under Secretary of Energy in the Obama Administration, with a portfolio of over $30 billion of energy investments

    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/project-team

  5. The goal
    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/aims-and-rationale

    After publication of its report in September 2014, the Commission will take its findings and recommendations directly to heads of government, finance and economic ministers, business leaders and investors throughout the world in a systematic outreach strategy. The results will be communicated to the wider economic community and civil society through a variety of global and national media channels. The aim is to contribute to global debate about economic policy, and to inform the policies pursued by governments and the investment decisions of the business and finance sectors.

    The Research Partners (new climate economy

    The project is being conducted by a team of economists and policy and business analysts drawn from, and supported by, a partnership of seven leading global economic and policy institutions:

    Managing Partner: World Resources Institute

    World Resources Institute

    http://www.wri.org/

    WRI is the managing partner of the New Climate Economy.

    World Resources Institute (WRI) is a global research organization that spans more than 25 countries, with offices in the United States, China, India, Brazil, and more. Our 350 experts and staff work closely with leaders to turn big ideas into action to sustain our natural resources—the foundation of economic opportunity and human well-being.

    •Climate Policy Initiative
    •Ethiopian Development Research Institute
    •Global Green Growth Institute
    •Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations
    •London School of Economics and Political Science
    •Stockholm Environment Institute
    •Tsinghua University

  6. THE GLOBAL COMMISSION

    The Global Commission

    The initiative is overseen by a Global Commission chaired by former President of Mexico Felipe Calderón. All members serve in a personal capacity.

    The members of the Global Commission are:

    Felipe Calderón (Chair)

    Former President of Mexico, and Visiting Fellow, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Mexico
    ———
    Ingrid Bonde

    Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Vattenfall Sweden
    ————-

    Sharan Burrow

    General Secretary, International Trade Union Confederation Australia
    ————–

    Chen Yuan
    Vice Chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, and former Chairman of the China Development Bank China
    —————–

    Helen Clark
    Administrator, UN Development Progamme, and former Prime Minister of New Zealand
    New Zealand
    —————-
    Luísa Diogo (Vice-Chair)

    Former Prime Minister of Mozambique, and Chairperson of the Board of Directors, Barclays Bank Mozambique
    Mozambique
    —————–

    Daniel L. Doctoroff
    President and CEO of Bloomberg LP US
    ————-
    S. Gopalakrishnan

    Executive Vice-Chairman, Infosys and President, Confederation of Indian Industry
    India
    —————-
    Angel Gurría
    Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Mexico
    —————-
    Chad Holliday
    Chairman, Bank of America US
    ——————
    Sri Mulyani Indrawati
    Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, The World Bank, and former Finance Minister of Indonesia
    Indonesia
    —————–
    Caio Koch-Weser
    Vice Chairman, Deutsche Bank Group and Chair of the European Climate Foundation
    Germany
    ——————–
    Ricardo Lagos
    Former President of Chile, and Professor at Large, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University
    Chile
    ———-
    Michel M. Liès
    Chief Executive Officer for the Swiss Re Group
    Luxembourg
    ————
    Trevor Manuel
    Minister and Chairperson of the South African Planning Commission, and former Finance Minister
    South Africa
    ——————-
    Takehiko Nakao
    President, Asian Development Bank
    Japan
    ——————-
    Eduardo Paes
    Mayor of Rio De Janeiro, and Chair of the C40
    Brazil
    ———-
    Annise Parker
    Mayor of Houston US
    ————-
    Paul Polman
    Chief Executive Officer, Unilever
    Netherlands
    —————
    Nemat Shafik
    Deputy Governor of the Bank of England and former Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
    Egypt / UK / US
    ——————
    Nicholas Stern (Vice-Chair)
    IG Patel Professor of Economics and Government, London School of Economics and Political Science
    UK
    —————
    Jens Stoltenberg
    UN Special Envoy on Climate Change, and former Prime Minister of Norway
    Norway
    —————
    Maria van der Hoeven
    Executive Director, International Energy Agency
    France
    ————-
    Zhu Levin
    President and Chief Executive Officer, China International Capital Corporation
    China
    ————–
    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/global-commission

  7. The Economics Advisory Panel

    NEW CLIMATE ECONOMY
    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/economics-advisory-panel

    An advisory group of leading economists from developed and developing countries will carry out an expert review of the New Climate Economy project’s work.

    Its members are:
    •Nicholas Stern (Chair), I G Patel Chair of Economics and Government, London School of Economics
    •Philippe Aghion, Robert C Waggoner Professor of Economics, Harvard University
    •Isher Judge Ahluwalia, Chairperson, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations
    •Kaushik Basu, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, World Bank
    •Ottmar Edenhofer, Professor of the Economics of Climate Change, Technical University of Berlin
    •Fan Gang, Director of the National Economic Research Institute, China
    •Ross Garnaut, Distinguished Professor of Economics, Australian National University
    •Daniel Kahneman, Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs Emeritus, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, and Nobel Laureate
    •Benno Ndulu, Governor, Central Bank of Tanzania
    •Carlota Perez, Professor of Technology and Socio-Economic Development, Tallinn University of Technology
    •Torsten Persson, Director of the Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University
    •Dani Rodrik, Albert O. Hirschman Professor of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study
    •A. Michael Spence, Professor of Economics, New York University, and Nobel Laureate
    •Rintaro Tamaki, Deputy Secretary General, OECD
    •TBC, Director, Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund
    http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/economics-advisory-panel

  8. The View From Here
    Hilary’s musings & miscellaneous missives
    UN enters US$4.5 trillion twilight zone

    However, with the World Investment Report estimating that the cost of meeting the SDGs [currently at “Zero-draft” stage Sustainable Development Goals -] in developing countries alone could be US$4.5 trillion,

    some magic may come in handy after all, to conjure the means of implementation.
    BLOG that is following this
    http://hro001.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/un-enters-us4-5-trillion-twilight-zone/

    “Oh, just a few footnotes …

    The program for the BIG meeting now underway doesn’t indicate who all the speakers might be. But for the not-so-big meeting in Nairobi that preceded it, not surprisingly UNEP head honcho,

    Achim Steiner

    , was very much in attendance

    An Advisory Panel of world-leading economists, chaired by

    Lord Nicholas Stern [who also happens to be Calderón’s Co-Chair

    -hro] will carry out an expert review of the work.
    This illustrious group seems to have launched itself on September 24th 2013.

    Here’s an excerpt from their Press Release:

    New Global Commission Aims to Identify Pathways to Economic Prosperity and a Safe Climate

    As evidence of human-induced climate change mounts, a new global commission launched today will analyze the economic costs and benefits of acting on climate change. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate comprises leaders from government, finance and business from 14 countries, chaired by former President of Mexico Felipe Calderón.

    source
    The View From Here

    Hilary’s musings & miscellaneous missives
    UN enters US$4.5 trillion twilight zone

    source
    http://hro001.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/un-enters-us4-5-trillion-twilight-zone/

  9. An AUSTRALIAN VERSION OF THE GLOBAL CLIMATE COMMISION?
    NO
    But it looks to train new fodder
    ——————————–
    http://internationalenergycentre.com/
    About Us
    ————

    extract
    “The International Energy Centre (IEC) is a collaborative initiative established by three of Australia’s leading universities and foundation industry member Glencore Xstrata. Our collective vision is to create an established centre of excellence in thought leadership, postgraduate education and innovation management to support the transition to a sustainable low carbon world.

    As a membership based, not-for-profit organisation, we bring together world-leading expertise and capabilities”
    —————–
    Foundation Members
    Glencore Xstrata?
    and
    ( universities of Newcastle, WA and Queensland)

    A company with mining interests ( non profit? )
    AHHH I get it. Its a company sponsoring energy studies and low carbon footprint

  10. Green-climate-fund-starts-hunt-for-cash

    http://www.rtcc.org/2014/06/30/uns-green-climate-fund-starts-hunt-for-cash/

    The UN’s climate chief Christiana Figueres says she will be disappointed if $10 billion is not raised by the end of 2014, as the world works towards a global emissions reduction treaty next year. “The meeting will focus on modalities, including the policies for contributions through which support can be mobilized. There is already broad participation and strong engagement with the Fund,” the GCF said in a statement. Report: UN Green CLimate Fund ‘ready’ to start work “Once capitalized, grants and concessional loans will be provided for mitigation and adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries. This process is expected to begin in early 2015.” The fund’s current lack of financial support is a major concern for the UN, which urgently needs developed countries to provide backing for the GCF to remain credible. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), over $550 billion a year is needed to accelerate the deployment of clean energy systems. German and UK diplomats say their countries are ready to deliver funds, although specific figures remain unclear. Some world leaders are expected to make financial pledges at UN Secretary General ban Ki-moon’s climate leader’s summit in New York on September 23.
    – See more at: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/06/30/uns-green-climate-fund-starts-hunt-for-cash/#sthash.5clEpLYI.dpuf

  11. The Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate (MEF)

    was launched on March 28, 2009. The MEF is intended to facilitate a candid dialogue among major developed and developing economies, help generate the political leadership necessary to achieve a successful outcome at the annual UN climate negotiations and advance the exploration of concrete initiatives and joint ventures that increase the supply of clean energy while cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

    The 17 major economies participating in the MEF are: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    http://www.majoreconomiesforum.org/

  12. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/11/world-council-of-churches-pulls-fossil-fuel-investments

    An umbrella group of churches, which represents over half a billion Christians worldwide, has decided to pull its investments out of fossil fuel companies.

    The move by the World Council of Churches, which has 345 member churches including the Church of England but not the Catholic church, was welcomed as a “major victory” by climate campaigners who have been calling on companies and institutions such as pension funds, universities and local governments to divest from coal, oil and gas.

  13. ” China and the US have announced a series of pacts to cut greenhouse gas emissions signalling their joint commitment to tackling climate change in the run up to Paris 2015.
    Changhua Wu, Greater China Director, The Climate Group, commented: “China and US continue their collaboration to decarbonize their economies. With the new pacts signed by both sides at the just concluded bilateral strategic and economic dialogue, it is expected that the word’s two largest economies are better positioned to lead a global clean revolution.”

    http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/china-and-russia-are-ruthlessly-cutting-the-legs-out-from-under-the-u-s-dollar

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s