The Elite class (corporations) aims to gain global bureaucratic control via a global AGW treaty..
After reading Tallbloke’s blog on how the BBC (media)are
“BBC journalists are being sent on courses to stop them inviting so many cranks onto programmes to air ‘marginal views’
The BBC Trust on Thursday published a progress report into the corporation’s science coverage which was criticised in 2012 for giving too much air-time to critics who oppose non-contentious issues.”
I responded to TB with my concerns
July 4, 2014 at 11:13 am
Was reading the global company news yesterday and there seems to be big push for ‘green energy/sustainability’ etc currently. (see Guardian/ sustainability section)
I don’t pretend to understand how the big global companies make money out of the AGW propaganda / carbon credit stuff.?
I read that global warming is causing the financial economy to collapse. LOL
For a reason l don’t understand global companies have their fortunes/ control mechanisms hinged on this AGW scam.
They obviously need to have the public on board to implement carbon trading or green credits?.
Global companies have taken over the western media and beyond so it is no surprise that employees are being told to tow the line or ship out!
There is no such thing as un biased reporting anymore. Companies control the lot. They feed the public what ever suits their corporate power population manipulation.
Including universities and school education and the media
and if they have infiltrated the judiciary system TB . You haven’t got a hope.
They will try to make it illegal to be sceptical about AGW or anything that suits them for that matter.
If companies control everything . Where is their accountability?
There isn’t any.
Monopoly . Game set and match
If you make enough noise they may try to shut you down on wordpress or censor you..
Your aiming to challenge the ‘big wigs’ of the New world corporate government.
I did some research as to why the Global elite ( corporations) are desperately wanting to stimmy AGW debate
There are ulterior motives
Thanks to JO NOVA and
for enlightening me
JO was onto this manipulation and control in 2012!! How prophetically true JO!
EXTRACTS.. . Serious stuff here!!
But above all, they want to shut their critics up—by any means short of violence. Opinions and evidence counter to the interests of the regulating class are “illegitimate”, and are ruthlessly suppressed.
Obviously the regulating class will now respond by regulating the Internet and lobbyist’s briefcases.
The Regulating Class
Consider the array of forces in the climate argument:
UN (including the IPCC)
NGO’s and Greenies
Mainstream news media
Major banks and finance houses
Private sector middle class
Amateurs (from amore , the Latin for love)
Why Global Warming is So Important to the Regulating Class
If human emissions of CO2 are causing a major planetary problem, then there are only two plausible solutions: wait and adapt, or regulate and reduce. Only the second solution interests the regulating class. To regulate CO2 emissions effectively and fairly you must regulate nearly all energy use, and thus most of the economy, in every nation of the world.
The regulating class promotes the dual beliefs that the “problem” of global warming is very scary and that it is caused by human emissions of CO2. The only solution they offer just happens to be complete regulation of the whole world’s economy by … the regulating class, of course.
The theory of manmade global warming is not a conspiracy. It is a confluence of vested interests in increased political regulation of the economy and rejecting market forces.
Bureaucrats, academics, government scientists, utilities, renewables manufacturers, bankers, most politicians—all these have a shared financial interest in imposing their solution to “manmade” global warming.
The Copenhagen Treaty was an Attempted Coup
Nearly all the world leaders met in Copenhagen in late 2009, expecting to sign the “Copenhagen Treaty” to limit CO2 emissions. But China and India torpedoed the negotiations, saying more research was needed to establish whether warming is manmade
The Treaty would have set up a new bureaucracy with the power to regulate CO2 emissions worldwide, able to regulate any market, over-riding national governments as required.
It could also fine and tax any signatory government.
In the hands of a judge from the regulating class, it could be interpreted to give this new global bureaucracy the power to tax every signatory nation and regulate its energy use almost completely—just look at how the US Constitution has been extended by interpretation over the years, and that’s a much clearer document. A hint in the Treaty could become the basis for a full blown mechanism to do almost anything the bureaucrats wished.
From experience with the monotonic growth of centralized power in federations of states, such as the United States or Australia, it is almost inevitable that within a few decades this new body would be parlayed up into a strong global bureaucracy regulating more than just CO2 emissions.
If something like the draft Treaty had been signed, it would have been the biggest transfer of sovereign power in recorded human history: nearly all the nations of the world would have ceded much of their sovereign power all at once. Yet the media scarcely raised an eyebrow.
All of that national sovereignty would have been ceded to an unelected group of global bureaucrats: Never in the field of human administration would so much power have been transferred by so many to so few. This was a narrowly averted global coup, an attempt to seize a great deal of power by stealth without the knowledge or explicit consent of the world’s people. It can only have been kept silent with the active support of the world’s media. But because of that silence, the coup has never been acknowledged, so the people of the world are unaware of it and further attempts could be made. Climate “science” is clearly flawed, but it is an excuse for a massive power play.
Figure 2: It is one of the oldest scams in human history: witchdoctors go to the rulers and say “the Gods are angry, there will be (more) catastrophes … we know how to appease the Gods, but it will cost you”. [Credit: CDC]
A Global Bureaucracy Would Be Bad
If a bureaucracy is global, there is nowhere to run to from high taxes, persecution, exploitation, selective enforcement of regulations, and so on
If their “solution” to global warming ushered in a global bureaucracy, people like these would be setting regulations worldwide, with no escape for anyone
The Trademark Tactics of the Regulating Class
If you oppose the regulating class, you will get called an “extremist”, a “nut”, a “conspiracy theorist”, “right wing”, and every variation of “stupid” and “ignorant”, irrespective of the merits of what you say. Say anything that mentions or might imply race and they will also call you a “racist”. Because they own the mainstream media
They hold pretend debates in their media studios with an audience of their supporters or a panel predominately of their supporters
The result: professionals and organizations appear to be all on their side. After all, they have all the government power, and all the taxpayers’ money.
Climate criminals almost took control of the whole world by deception, a grand fraud. Money has changed hands on a vast scale
All the beneficiaries are from the new regulating class, which happens to be in charge of the justice system. So no one will go to jail or even pay back their ill-gotten gains to the taxpayers. The rest of society paid for this nonsense, transferring huge quantities of money to the new class,
The push towards a global bureaucracy, using climate change as an excuse,
The real issue here is a grab for absolute power by those who already govern. They have grown tired of democracy and would like to do away with it, without ever giving the game away by actually saying so.
“global warming” is the Trojan Horse the regulating class are hoping to ride to victory over the people.
About the Author
Dr David M.W. Evans
consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010,
In 2007 .. skeptical …. there was more to the global warming issue than just the science..